Stereogum Home
January 28, 2008

The Simpsons Revisit The '90s, Reveal Homer Invented Grunge

Fresh premises don't come easy for a show 19 years into its existence, but hats off to last night's The Simpsons, mining nostalgia for the decade after the show was created. It was That '90s Show: Marge and Homer taught the kids about the decade of Zima, the Soup Nazi, and money machines. The episode's 1990s are before Bart was born, because chronology on the The Simpsons sometimes doesn't make sense.

Anyway! Homer's working for his dad's laser tag arena, and college student Marge Develops a crush on her professor, which leads Homer to reinvent his nu-R&B singing group as grunge bad Sadgasm (two tunes sound like "Rape Me" and "Glycerine"). Also featured: Semisonic's "Closing Time," the Verve's "Bittersweet Symphony," and of course a Kurt Loder cameo:

The Simpsons revisit the '90s, introduce Homer Simpson's band: Sadgasm

After the jump, a depressed and grungy Homer watches "Weird Al" sing "Brain Freeze" to the tune of the Sadgasm tune that's to the tune of "Rape Me" ("Shave Me") along with a Sadgasm performance of "Margerine" (sounds like "Glycerine") and the explanation of Homer's withdrawal issues.

Here, Homer invents grunge and sings "Politically Incorrect" (sorry Bill Maher), to the sort-of-tune to "Lithium":

Nice Back To The Future reference, McFly. Here, "Brain Freeze":

Finally, the official video for "Margerine," from the album Desolation Hatchback:


Posted at 10:19 AM in ,
Tags:  |  |  |




-->

31 Comments

'The episode's 2990s are before Bart was born, because chronology on the The Simpsons sometimes doesn't make sense. '

I'll say! almost a century in the future, and Bart hasn't been born yet?

Posted by: Dan at 01/28/08 10:53 AM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

I thought the episode was pretty clever ;) I loved the music!

Posted by: theEvilAngel at 01/28/08 10:56 AM | Reply
Score = -1 Vote up Vote down

Worst episode ever.

Posted by: TipTop at 01/28/08 12:02 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

stop with the retcons!

Posted by: Rich at 01/28/08 12:08 PM | Reply
Score = 1 Vote up Vote down

The weird chronology confuses me.

Posted by: bookwibble at 01/28/08 12:48 PM | Reply
Score = 1 Vote up Vote down

"hats off"?? I am so dreading this episode airing in the UK. I knew they had gone downhill in the last few years, but that episode looks ridiculous. There was a time when I wished the Simpsons would go on forever. Now I wish they'd just fuck off.

Posted by: stephen at 01/28/08 1:12 PM | Reply
Score = 2 Vote up Vote down

Really stunned by the poor quality.

At the beginning, I thought it would be great. Nobody's lampooning the 90s, and here the Simpsons had a golden opportunity. But, it was a disappointment.

And, I say this as a loyal Simpsons fan who watches every week.

Instead of delivering the rapid-fire humor that we're used to, this episode gets lost in a Marge-cheating-on-Homer thing. After the previous Marge-cheating-on-Homer thing with the bowling instructor, you'd think they'd know better than to go there.

Still, 18 years worth of episodes and only two clinkers (in my opinion) is a pretty good batting average!

Posted by: MildApplause at 01/28/08 2:14 PM | Reply
Score = 1 Vote up Vote down

No, no, Stephen. Seriously: put a hat on when that episode comes on. I guarantee you that it will be at least partially off by the end of the episode. Honest. It was funny.

Posted by: silnlo at 01/28/08 2:16 PM | Reply
Score = -1 Vote up Vote down

um...so the shows are getting a little better i guess but pretty much from '03-now are pretty shitty.

Posted by: jdubs at 01/28/08 3:14 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

i appreciated the shave me with your irony lyric.

Posted by: vinnie at 01/28/08 8:01 PM | Reply
Score = -1 Vote up Vote down

MARGERINE!! ROCKS

Posted by: rao at 01/28/08 11:24 PM | Reply
Score = -1 Vote up Vote down

Actually, the chronology of The Simpsons is quite simple. For example, Bart always remains the same age, so his date/year of birth advances with each passing season...same idea for the other characters.

Posted by: roy at 01/29/08 9:42 AM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

The show was a slap in the face to all long-time loyal Simpsons fans who've been watching it since it started in 1989. I kept watching it in disbelief. It was kind of like watching a train wreck, but I wanted to see it through to the end to see if this was actually supposed to be a real flashback, because I kept hoping it wouldn't be real, and Marge would wake up saying, "Homie, I just had the strangest dream!" But alas, it wasn't.

As so many people have already stated, this episode completely destroyed all pre-established history of the Simpsons from past episodes. Now I know, I already heard the rebuttals about how the characters don't age and there's no continuity on the Simpsons, but until last night the one thing you could trust is that the writers wouldn't mess with already pre-written history. I just always assumed the characters were frozen in present-day time to equate for the non-aging thing, but the history such as how Homer and Marge met (in high school in the 70s, Marge went to the prom with Arnie, she realizes she likes Homer, she beeps at Homer on her way back and lands up picking him up as he's walking on the side of the road-"Alright, alright, I'll walk in the mud", remember?) or Marge being pregnant with Maggie in the 80s (Bart was a toddler and jealous of his baby sister Lisa getting all the attention-Lisa's first word is Bart)-this is classic show memories and you don't mess with them. When you mess with character history, you are also messing with character development, and that's unforgivable.

They want a tribute to the 90s? The show was on the air all throughout the 90s-in fact it was its heyday where the show was not only great but also pure comedic genius-the best thing on TV at the time. Most of the episodes were chock-full of pop culture references. Seasons 2-10-right there-there's your tribute to the 90s. They would have been better off just re-showing one of these episodes then resort to the atrocity that was last night's show. In fact, long-time fans of the show might remember that they already did a show that was a perfect parody of the 90s-it was called Homerpalooza. And the ironic thing about it is, if I recall, Bart thought Homer was uncool because he didn't like 90s music and all his music was old, so Homer tries to prove them wrong by taking them to a rock concert that was making fun of Lollapalooza. And the grunge is in there-Cypress Hill and Smashing Pumpkins are in it-as well as the crowd swaying, stage diving, sarcastic cynical teens, all of that. And that's why I cringed when I heard Bart make that absolutely asinine comment in the beginning of last night's show, "The 90s, never heard of it." WHAT!!!

As far as I'm concerned, with last night's episode, the writers pi--ed all over the long-cherished memories of long-time Simpsons fans of happier episodes gone by. The sad thing is this used to be a show that would never stoop to such lows and unlike other shows on TV, had huge respect for its audience. Now with this episode it has shown great disdain for its audience. The only thing that could have saved it was a little bit of self-referential humor that would have been like winking at the audience to say, "Hey, we know this is completely wrong and we just completely ignored the first 10 seasons of the show", such as comic book guy popping up and saying, Wait a minute...are we to believe that Homer and Marge were dating in the 90s while clearly in past episodes it was established that...." in that self-important, know-it-all tone of his. But they didn't even do that.

As far as I'm concerned, the writers have effectively killed the Simpsons as of last night's episode. The show is now dead and unless they somehow do something next week where they formally revoke last week's episode and say "let's all forget last week's episode ever happened, and it shall be banished from our memories and never be spoken of again under punishment of torture", ala The Principle Skinner is not really Principle Skinner episode, then I don't think I'm going to be watching anymore. You can't mess with fans memories. The writers of this episode should be ashamed of themselves.

Posted by: simpsons fan at 01/29/08 10:04 PM | Reply
Score = 3 Vote up Vote down

In a word, no. While I agree that those are pivotal moments in Simpsons history, The writers didn't "p--s" on the history they actually added an element. They inserted a section where Marge was in college. They didn't alter the prom story. And as far as the rest of the references go, those things you mentioned don't henge on the decade in which they took place. ie Bart can still be jealous of his new baby sister in the early 2000's even in the 3000 because the shows are simply timeless.

At first I was a little put off by the idea of Marge cheating on Homer (more like fantasizing about it) but the more I watch the episode (about 3 times at this point) it's actually pretty good. And so long as in the end Marge says "Homey is where my heart is." I'm good. You can't have more emotional stock in The Simpsons than me. If I'm satisfied you should be happy, period.

Posted by: theprince in reply to simpsons fan's comment at 04/17/08 1:38 AM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

Dearest simpsons fan,
Get a grip. It's just a cartoon. You can't mess with fans memories? Key-rist, get a girlfriend already. Having said that though, the episode was a bit like watching a Simpsons episode of Michael Ian Black talking about how he loves the 90s.

Posted by: Hairdresser Jones at 01/30/08 1:24 AM | Reply
Score = -2 Vote up Vote down

I loved the way the show depicted the 90s. The cult of Sonic the hedgehog, beanie babies, all the weird bar alternatives like cigar bars, oxygen bars, cyber and porformance art cafes, ect. and of course, weird al. Loved every second of it (thought the gas man was the prof for a while). The thing that anoyed me was the retcon though, if you do the math, nothing before 1998 happened. so that means goodbye to my favorite episodes: no more thrillhouse, no more homer as a hippie, no more frank grimes, no more little lisa recylcing. I'd have to flip a coin here. heads i give it an 11 out of 10 tails i give it -3 out of 10.

Posted by: jay at 01/30/08 2:22 AM | Reply
Score = -1 Vote up Vote down

I say it's about time we have a bring back the 90s movement! The 90s where a much better time. we should start 90s retro movement, make the 2010s a repeat of the 1990s. that said, the retcon did get me a little upset, but the pure awesomeness of this show more than makes up for this.

Posted by: simpsons mater flex at 01/30/08 2:30 AM | Reply
Score = -1 Vote up Vote down

The episode was funny, but that doesn't make up for the retcon. BOO RETCON!

Posted by: simpsons fanatic at 01/30/08 2:35 AM | Reply
Score = -1 Vote up Vote down

simpsons universe is elastic, all you losers need to accept this. long live the 90s!

Posted by: some guy at 01/30/08 2:48 AM | Reply
Score = -2 Vote up Vote down

greatest moment in simpsons history since flanders' wife died.

Posted by: jack at 01/30/08 2:55 AM | Reply
Score = -1 Vote up Vote down

if the next episode is anywhere near as controversal, or funny, the simpsons could be on their way back up. they could ride the duel waves of the movie and this episode back to the point they where at (ironically enough) in the 1990s, and bring back the 90s in the process. I can see a major 90s comeback movement for the rest of this decade and the 2010s arising from this episode. This is just what the simpsons needed: a freash start. and retcon isn't all that bad. if not for retcon, batman would still be adam west style.

Posted by: me. at 01/30/08 3:35 AM | Reply
Score = -1 Vote up Vote down

either the best, or worst episode ever, depending on who you ask. this is a 90s tribute/parody episode, and a major retcon. Probablly the most controversial episode to come down the pipes in a number of years.

Posted by: educated young player at 01/30/08 3:43 AM | Reply
Score = -1 Vote up Vote down

Only the Simpsons could possibly bring on this much discussion. I've been watching since I was 9 years old so I guess I grew up them. I thought the episode was ok but Homerpoolza was better. And to the people that are getting all worked up, relax it's a cartoon, Comic Book Guy.

Posted by: fronski at 01/30/08 1:13 PM | Reply
Score = -1 Vote up Vote down

I'm one of the biggest Simpsons fans I can think of. I have countless hours of home made VHSs containg dated chronological Simpsons episodes, all the DVDs, and at least one unopened 6 pack of Buzz.

Now that being said, I have to admit, the 90's episode, was pretty funny. Spending all of my teenage years in the 90's, as the majority of the die hard Simpsons fans did, made this episode really easy to relate to. Someone here said that this episode shows that the writers have lost all respect for their audience, but I think its just the opposite. They know exactly who their fans are. They know we were there throughout the 90s (both in reality and for the show) and I'm happy that they didn't rely on self referential meta-humor for this episode. In fact, a big part of the Simpsons slump had been that they started using nothing but inside jokes. Had they commented on the discontinuity, it would have been that same gag that they've done a hundred times before. They know that we knew that this episode wouldn't make any linear sense in the grand scheme of things. I could feel that all the way through without them having to out right say it. When Bart said, "90s? Never heard of it!" it was funny because he obviously was there... with the bartman and eat my shorts t-shirts to boot. The whole thing was tongue in cheek.

Plus the Nirvana rip-offs were great.

Kudos to the Simpsons for making fun of themselves without ever saying that that's what they were doing.

Posted by: Red Crayon Eater Viking at 01/31/08 2:59 PM | Reply
Score = -2 Vote up Vote down

i like it when people go, "that's unforgiveable."

Posted by: rkx at 02/01/08 11:18 PM | Reply
Score = -1 Vote up Vote down

@ rkx:

Even better when they say it and then immediately tune back in next week.

Posted by: joykicksdarkness at 02/02/08 12:53 PM | Reply
Score = -1 Vote up Vote down

I think it's interesting that some people are so upset that this episode "destroyed" all the characters' history. So, it's more plausible that Marge was pregnant with Maggie in the '80s even though she's still a baby?? Like a lot of you already said, it's a cartoon, don't have a cow man.

I thought the "Back to the Future" reference was bloody brilliant and Sadgasm has to be one of the best band names ever. I rarely watch new Simpsons episodes because they're just not that funny anymore, but this one had me laughing the whole way through.

Posted by: BeckEye at 02/03/08 1:35 PM | Reply
Score = -2 Vote up Vote down

for all of those bashing this episode, arguing that this new series of events ruins the chronology of the simpsons &/or has already been done before, stop watching the show & tune into braindead criminal/medical dramas like "CSI," "CSI: Miami," "CSI: Helena," or "Grey's Anatomy."
while the show is not as fresh after 400+ episodes as seasons one through eight, i would much rather watch a "piss poor" simpson's episode than an episode of family guy or american dad. all of you haters do me a favor: thank the simpsons for providing years of well written laughs & jump off a cliff.

Posted by: chinaboy at 02/04/08 5:40 PM | Reply
Score = -2 Vote up Vote down

I think the episode was alright. I mean, it shocked me in the beginning when Homer first mentioned the 90's as being before Bart was born considering that everyone pretty much considers Bart to had been born in the 1980's. But considering the fact that The Simpsons is now two decades old, what sense does it make for a 10 year old to have a birthdate in the 90's. It was also quite interesting to see the 90's references as that is our generation. It took away from the continuity, in fact I thought that by the end it was going to be revealed as some sort of joke or at some point like when Lisa began to calculate, there would be some sort of pun. But overall I liked it. Stop living in the past haters. Its almost 2010.

Posted by: Kenny at 02/07/08 3:02 PM | Reply
Score = 1 Vote up Vote down

I thought this was a fantastic episode. The songs rock and Margerine rules, poetry. I see a lot of people are pissed about the odd space time continuum in Springfield. All I can say is wow.

I have to agree with Beckeye, the Simpsons isn't what it used to be but I always have laughs which is more that I can say about many of the new sitcoms. Believe me I know, I watch A LOT of tv.

Posted by: Jim at 02/08/08 11:11 PM | Reply
Score = -2 Vote up Vote down

It's hilarious that so-called Simpsons fans are bitching about retcons. I bet you also have a pet theory about what state Springfield is REALLY in.

Posted by: 300baud at 03/04/08 1:13 PM | Reply
Score = -2 Vote up Vote down

Leave a comment


 

The 'Gum Drop

Get our newsletter. MP3s and giveaways weekly.

Search




Sort by:date relevance

Information

  • Contact:
  • About
  • Press
  • Advertising
  • Stereogum RSS Stereogum RSS XML Icon
  • MP3-Only RSS Stereogum RSS XML Icon

Staff

Founder/Editor-In-Chief
Scott Lapatine
Executive Editor
Amrit Singh
Senior Writer
Brandon Stosuy
Columnist
Jon McMillan
Technology & Operations
Jim Jazwiecki
Angela Williams

The Cool Kids

All Stereogum Posts

Get Flash to see our mp3 player. Here are our mp3s: Hospital Ships - I Want It To Get Out (»)
Mogwai - The Sun Smells Too Loud (»)
Ungdomskulen - Ordinary Son (Radio Edit) (»)
Damien Jurado - Where Lies My Tarp (»)
Birdmonster - Born To Be Your Man (»)
Grizzly Bear - While You Wait For The Others (Live At Morning Becomes Eclectic) (»)
Genghis Tron - Things Don't Look Good (Rob Crow Remix) (»)
CSS - Rat Is Dead (Rage) (»)
James Jackson Toth - Doreen (»)
Twi The Humble Feather - Higher Than The End (»)
Roadside Graves - Ruby (»)
No Age - Eraser (»)
Doveman - Footloose (»)
Rooftop Vigilantes - Oscar Want 7 Inch (»)
Dr. Dog - The Ark (»)
Oxford Collapse - The Birthday Wars (»)
Neil Halsted - Paint a Face (»)
Throw Me The Statue - If This Is It (Huey Lewis Cover) (»)

Band to Watch logo

Band To Watch: Hospital Ships

As we pass saturation point for press coverage of Montreal, Portland, Brooklyn and et cetera, it seems Lawrence, Kansas is poised for its coming turn in the music media trend piece carousel. At least from what we're hearing; this marks...

MORE »

Quit Your Day Job logo

Quit Your Day Job: Ungdomskulen

The Bergen trio Ungdomskulen play proggy post punk, mixing chops and hooks with a sense of humor. But they don't sound like Primus. When I was in Norway a couple years ago, "Ungdomskulen" seemed to be on everybody's lips (or...

MORE »

Premature Evaluation logo

Premature Evaluation: Beck - Modern Guilt

It's been some time since we learned Modern Guilt, Beck Hansen's eighth album, would be some sort of psych rock minimalist '60s trip with Danger Mouse. Since then, we've gotten a look at the old-school jazz/Blue Note-style cover art and...

MORE »

Video Hangover logo

Video Hangover: Papa Roach - "Getting Away With Murder"

Every week, we dig in the archives for videos that we find noteworthy, memorable, or just unbelievably stupid. And then, Jon McMillan breaks 'em down for you. This week: Papa Roach lands an uppercut on the glass jaw of big oil.

MORE »

Oldstand logo

OldStand: SPIN, November, 1990

Take our ink-stained hands and join us at the OldStand, where Jon McMillan goes to remind everyone what an honest-to-goodness music magazine is supposed to look like. For the cover story, Bob Guccione Jr. himself gets in the ring with...

MORE »

The Outsiders logo

The Outsiders: Vol. 15: Clark, My Brightest Diamond, Wildbirds & Peacedrums

Not all of Stereogum's favorite sounds conform to what folks expect us to cover. In this space, resident Bananafish fetishist Brandon Stosuy usually focuses on bands, albums, singles, and villages in Sweden that may otherwise pass by unnoticed. This time...

MORE »

The 'Gum Drop logo

Damien Jurado - "Murderer" (Low Cover)

After hearing "Gillian Was A Horse" from Damien Jurado's forthcoming Caught In The Trees, we contacted the Seattle singer-songwriter and asked if he'd want to premiere a track at Stereogum. Lucky for us (and you), it turned out he had...

MORE »