Profile 
Coj
Website: -
Find Me On:

Comments

 +5Posted on Mar 19th, 2012 | re: In Defense Of Skrillex (286 comments)

Dude, seriously.

 0Posted on Dec 21st, 2011 | re: The Gummy Awards: Your Top 10 Albums Of 2011 (147 comments)

Do you ever get the impression that us indie fans are just suggestible morons like everyone else?

 0Posted on Oct 18th, 2011 | re: The 10 Best Indie Rock Songs Under 2 Minutes (115 comments)

White Denim – El Hard Attack DCWYW

 +4Posted on Oct 10th, 2011 | re: Real Estate Days Comment Party (37 comments)

Yeah, Etienne is no longer the drummer and I don’t think he recorded on Days (I might be wrong). The drums (and the musicianship in general) sound a lot tighter on this album, which I actually think is to its detriment. If you listen back to the drum tracks on their s/t debut (the propulsive railroad beat of ‘Beach Comber’; that weird rubbery flex in ‘Pool Swimmers’; the flat thud of ‘Suburban Dogs’; the splashy toms in ‘Fake Blues’; the ride/jam block groove of ‘Let’s Rock The Beach’), they’re much looser, which is fundamental in cultivating that insouciant atmosphere. That said, it’s still a lovely album, with some gorgeous turns. I think it’ll grow on me with time, but I don’t think I’ll come to love it like I do their debut.

 +3Posted on Sep 22nd, 2011 | re: Five Indie Types Who Would Do Well On X Factor... And Five Who Wouldn't (65 comments)

I think Stereogum are basing this on his stage presence though, which doesn’t come across on record, of course. As they said: he’s a handsome dude, he dresses smartly, carries himself well and puts a lot of power behind his vocal performance (I know, I know, “if I like him so much, why don’t I marry him?” etc, etc). Plus, as anyone who’s witnessed their live performance of ‘All Hands And The Cook’ will testify, the guy can hold a throat-rippingly high note for a ridiculous length of time:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eg2S6ffvkr8&feature=related

 +20Posted on Sep 13th, 2011 | re: Stereogum's 40 Best New Bands of 2011 (138 comments)

That was actually a re-release. THIS is the much anticipated, and inevitably disappointing, second comment.

 +2Posted on Sep 13th, 2011 | re: Stereogum's 40 Best New Bands of 2011 (138 comments)

“breaking wind on a lot of these young acts” – think you might be looking for a different expression there…

 +16Posted on Sep 13th, 2011 | re: Stereogum's 40 Best New Bands of 2011 (138 comments)

“breaking wind on a lot of these young acts” – think you might be looking for a different expression there…

 +8Posted on Sep 6th, 2011 | re: Clap Your Hands Say Yeah Hysterical Comment Party (58 comments)

You don’t sound sorry.

 +4Posted on Sep 6th, 2011 | re: Clap Your Hands Say Yeah Hysterical Comment Party (58 comments)

It wasn’t, Denis. Not that you’ll be inclined to believe me, of course. In any case, if Tom Hanks has made a pretentious movie I can’t think of it: he’s made a career out of playing the ‘everyman’.

 +11Posted on Sep 6th, 2011 | re: Clap Your Hands Say Yeah Hysterical Comment Party (58 comments)

On a scale of The Da Vinci Code to Forrest Gump, I’d give it a solid Toy Story 3.

 0Posted on Jul 8th, 2011 | re: Polaris 2011 Shortlist: Arcade Fire, 9 Other Bands (20 comments)

It’s a bit of a joke that Women didn’t make the shortlist. Public Strain is a phenomenal album.

 +4Posted on Jun 21st, 2011 | re: Stereogum's Top 20 Albums Of 2011 So Far (276 comments)

Your reasoning is contradictory. You know why all three people left it off their ‘best of the rest’ list’? Because, as you said yourself, “they didn’t think it was that great”. I sincerely doubt that the omission is borne out of editorial politics. What would they have to lose by including it, or gain by leaving it out? The vast majority of Pitchfork’s demographic will also read Stereogum, because the larger part of their editorial output covers the same genre(s) and artists, so from an ‘audiencing’ perspective it would make good business sense to include James Blake/Panda Bear in their top 20. You can bet that the ONLY reason they weren’t included was because the Stereogum staff liked it less than the albums represented above.

And in response to your final point: you know another website that counts Panda Bear/Animal Collective among its perenially covered artists? Stereogum. Type ‘Panda Bear’ into the search bar and see how many posts have made mention of his name. Would it make sense, after following Panda Bear for years and documenting details of the album release extensively prior to its release, for Stereogum to suddenly neglect him due to an anti-Pitchfork agenda? No, it wouldn’t. They simply weren’t enamoured with the album itself.

 +2Posted on Jun 21st, 2011 | re: Stereogum's Top 20 Albums Of 2011 So Far (276 comments)

Neither, I’m guessing. The album was far from universally appreciated. A lot of people have expressed their distaste for it (even those who enjoyed his earlier output and were anticipating a great album). Moreover, it’s pretty hard to claim its non-inclusion is a result of ‘anti-Pitchfork’ sentiment, when the top 20 includes about 10 albums (by my count) that have been similarly championed by Pitchfork.

 -3Posted on Jun 16th, 2011 | re: Indie Songs Of The Summer 2001-2011 (151 comments)

I do believe that the song of the Summer in 2009 was ‘Surprise Hotel’ by Fool’s Gold.

 +1Posted on Apr 19th, 2011 | re: Battles - Gloss Drop Premature Evaluation (31 comments)

I can see that ‘coming across as a complete tool’ isn’t substantial enough criteria to dissuade you from leaving a snarky comment. Ascertain this (imagine me grabbing my junk).

 +4Posted on Apr 16th, 2011 | re: Radiohead - "Supercollider" & "The Butcher" (32 comments)

“In England they call glue sticks lorries” … do we?

 0Posted on Feb 12th, 2011 | re: tUnE-yArDs - "Bizness" (15 comments)

Lovely stuff. Melody + sax reminds me of ‘Yam Lo Moshech’ by Fool’s Gold.

 0Posted on Jan 25th, 2011 | re: Double Take: Arcade Fire - The Suburbs (191 comments)

Just in case anybody thinks my argument here is linked to my overall feelings about album: I actually like The Suburbs and don’t support Brandon’s take on the album. I enjoyed reading it regardless!

 +3Posted on Jan 25th, 2011 | re: Double Take: Arcade Fire - The Suburbs (191 comments)

This was posted today and is already #1 most commented on post. I’m guessing it’ll be the most viewed shortly too. The popularity alone (be it inspired by negativity or positivity) is reason enough to keep the feature running. You helped contribute to this popularity: well done, you!

Personally, I find the idea of ‘just moving on’ without stopping to reflect on music of the recent past a really contemptible approach to appreciating music. Not everything needs to be so bleeding-edge current and ‘on the pulse’ that it renders the music itself disposable. You can’t seriously tell me that you’ve never bought an album and thought “this is terrible!”, only to find that you love it 6 months down the line (or vice-versa: loved -> hated). Everybody has had this sort of experience, and it’s a testament to the enduring quality of the artform that our relationship with it can change over a significant period of time. This double take feature, in my opinion, celebrates that relationship while casting a level critical eye at the music itself divorced from the headlines/hubbub it generated on its release.

If you want up to date news and reviews go to Pitchfork, Drowned In Sound, Cokemachineglow, Tinymixtapes, Rolling Stone or NME (whatever suits you). This is a blog, which is supposed to have opinion pieces like this as part of its core content. I still think it’s a great feature, so keep ‘em coming, Stereogum.

 0Posted on Jan 12th, 2011 | re: Drowning Pool Devastated To Have Inspired Tucson Murderer (6 comments)

You’re still hitting them corners in them low-lows, girl?

 0Posted on Jan 10th, 2011 | re: Double Take: Kanye West - My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy (190 comments)

Just want to say that I love the idea of this ‘double take’ feature. As stated, it might be difficult to make it something other than just a contrarians view of prevailing opinion, but I think the notion of ‘reviewing reviews’ and opening a critical dialogue is important and lamentably uncommon (maybe I’m just visiting the wrong sites). In any case, I hope to see more of this in future. Bravo, Stereogum/Brandon.

 +1Posted on Dec 1st, 2010 | re: NME Top 75 Albums Of 2010 (157 comments)

Yeah, those dudes should lay off the drugs.

 0Posted on Nov 24th, 2010 | re: Stereogum's 50 Most Anticipated Albums Of 2011 (219 comments)

Crystal Stilts – TBA

If the ‘Shake The Shackles’/'Magnetic Moon’ 7” is any indication of what the album will be like, then I’ll certainly be looking forward to it.

 0Posted on Nov 18th, 2010 | re: Strokes Complete LP4? (15 comments)

re: Stereogum’s leads. Scott, didn’t Stereogum’s ‘trusted sources’ say that The Avalanches’ new album would be out in 2010? Safety wink! ;-).