EternalCynic
Recents Comments from EternalCynic
Wow, Vivian Girls at #7? That sucks for you, Brooklyn.
on NYMag's 40 Songs That Define The Brooklyn Sound at November 10, 2009 3:48 PMScore = 2
I realize I am probably going to get flamed to death for this, but I thought the last album these guys did was a terrible piece of sucking crap and sounded like they had they had trained a team of moneys to play a set of broken instruments and then recorded the ensuing distortion-fuzz-equals-artistic-brilliance cacophony and sat around awarding themselves prizes for music and quoting their review on Pitchfork to each other. In other words, everything that's bad about lo-fi music.
However, maybe it's because of discovering Vivian Girls, I didn't mind this song. Dude badly needs to invest in a singing class though.
on New Times New Viking - "No Time, No Hope" at July 8, 2009 5:19 AMScore = 0
Honestly I don't think I could put them into a hierarchy like that. I really like Think Tank and Modern Life is Rubbish and Parklife and 13, but I like them all for different reasons. I think I go back to Great Escape and Parklife more than I do to the rest of the catalogue. On first listen I would have said Blur was their weakest album but it grew on me like crazy
In reply to SubSickAlien's comment on Reunited Blur Perform Live At A Museum In Essex at June 19, 2009 7:23 PMScore = 0
Yes, yes, a million times yes.
on Reunited Blur Perform Live At A Museum In Essex at June 15, 2009 8:37 PMScore = 5
Wait, wait, what? Stereogum likes Grizzly Bear and Dirty Projectors? I, for one, am shocked.
on Bonnaroo 2009: Brooklyn Go Hard at June 13, 2009 9:14 PMScore = 18
I'm forced to agree about the 'brother musicians' bit, it's not as though every musician is part of some elitist club and it's an asinine thing to say. I just don't think her core point is very inflammatory, even though it's couched in accusatory (not to mention confusing!) language.
In reply to understood's comment on Sonic Youth Take Manhattan, Dis Radiohead at June 11, 2009 3:48 PMScore = 1
I don't know, I don't feel like there's anything that biting here. All she's saying is that Radiohead are lucky to be in a place where they can afford to give away albums without worrying about it, and that just because other bands can't afford to do that financially doesn't mean they are any less devoted to their fanbase.
Also, Mark Ibold is the shit.
on Sonic Youth Take Manhattan, Dis Radiohead at June 11, 2009 2:05 PMScore = 6
I'm not sure if this blows my indie cred or not but THREE PART VOCAL HARMONY MOTHERFUCKER
on The Beatles: Rock Band Gets A Trailer at June 1, 2009 8:45 PMScore = 30
Love this bitch
on New Yeah Yeah Yeahs Video - "Heads Will Roll" at May 26, 2009 1:21 PMScore = 2
No recent comments.






































Ok so check this out everybody.. This is a Over/Under for Blur where a music critic for Magnet breaks down which songs he/she considers to be the bands most over and under-rated songs from their catalog. I find it interesting and agree and disagree with some of it. Read on..
Blur was one of the most quintessentially English bands of the Britpop era. Drifting from shoegaze to grunge to pop, the group always retained its core influences of the Kinks, the Beatles and XTC. But despite a few solitary hits, Blur never quite made it in the U.S. And that’s a shame, because with a span of seven full-lengths, multiple EPs and some killer singles, Blur proved that it had the staying power many of its contemporaries lacked. But as the band succeeded financially, guitarist Graham Coxon grew more and more disenchanted, finally leaving after 1999’s 13. Following 2003’s difficult Think Tank, Blur went on hiatus. Since then, Coxon has developed a prolific solo career, singer Damon Albarn founded Gorillaz, bassist Alex James started a cheese farm, and drummer Dave Rowntree ran unsuccessfully for public office. Now reunited as a four-piece for the first time in nearly a decade, Blur is back in the public eye. And with rumors of a new album circulating, what better time to examine its most underrated and overrated songs?
:: The Five Most Overrated Blur Songs
1. “Song 2” (1997)
Woo-hoo! Now name another line from “Song 2.” A Nirvana parody that the rest of the world took seriously, “Song 2″ is good, grungy fun and remains Blur’s highest-charting single in the U.S. It’s not that Blur couldn’t do heavy riffs (the brilliant “Popscene” or “Bank Holiday”) or that it didn’t know when to just have fun (“Girls & Boys”). So what made “Song 2” so huge? It’s probably the woo-hoos.
2. “Parklife” (1994)
Parklife the album made Blur the defining band of the Britpop generation. (For the few months until Oasis’ (What’s The Story) Morning Glory? came out, anyway.) But “Parklife” the song made Blur feel like a caricature by reducing its many talents into something cheap. “Parklife” goes beyond comedy and into just plain goofy. In attempting a Who-style character piece (the song even features spoken verses by Quadrophenia mod Phil Daniels), Blur assumes the “cheeky chap” image that would often hold it back from experimenting with its musical potential.
3. “She’s So High” (1991)
With its droning beat and slightly sketchy lyrics (“I want to crawl all over her”), Blur deserved a better beginning than “She’s So High.” Despite its flaws, Leisure is a thoroughly solid debut thanks to buoyant numbers “There’s No Other Way” and “Bad Day.” So why start off a career with “She’s So High”? At least it gave Blur a chance to produce one of the most dated videos in music history.
4. “Country House” (1995)
By the mid-’90s, Britpop was beginning to show signs of strain. With Oasis scrambling to repeat the success of Morning Glory, Pulp struggling to deal with success and Blur working on a follow-up to the massive Parklife, it was only a matter of time before it all fell apart. “Country House,” the center of a publicity feud with Oasis, was Blur by the numbers, complete with a goofy video and a sneering dismissal of the middle class. While it might have won the battle of the charts, Blur ultimately lost the Britpop war, and “Country House” has aged about as well as Albarn’s Penguin Books T-shirt.
5. “Crazy Beat” (2003)
OK, so there aren’t that many fans of “Crazy Beat.” Not in this universe, anyway. But it was one of Blur’s final singles and also one of its biggest chart successes. A supposed reinvention that wound up more annoying than inventive, “Crazy Beat” can always be defended under the catch-all of “experimentation.” Duck noises are not experimentation. They are annoying. And until Blur release something new, our last memories of the band will be of “Good Song” and “Crazy Beat.” That is, frankly, unacceptable.
:: The Five Most Underrated Blur Songs
1. “You’re So Great” (1997)
A Coxon number from the often bombastic Blur, “You’re So Great” is strangely sweet and instantly memorable. Coxon’s too-often neglected talents (see 1998’s “Coffee & TV”) might have led to the band’s split, but it gave him free rein to explore a vibrant solo career. True, if the world had paid a little more attention to Coxon during his time with the band, we might’ve had more Blur. We certainly wouldn’t have had Think Tank. But we probably wouldn’t have had this overlooked, stripped-down love song gone awry. “Sad, drunk and poorly,” indeed.
2. “Badhead” (1994)
A brief pause in the hectic mash of Parklife, “Badhead” is one of Blur’s loveliest pop moments, with a horn section and ironic detachment in spades. But as with many of Blur’s best songs, it’s clear that Albarn’s claim of “I might as well just grin and bear it” isn’t fooling anyone. How “Badhead” wasn’t released as a single is surprising; how it didn’t become a pop classic is unthinkable.
3. All of The Great Escape (1995)
OK, so The Great Escape wasn’t the best follow-up to the chart-conquering Parklife. It was indulgent, possibly due to some illicit substances consumed during its creation. But The Great Escape is stacked with some of the band’s best singles (“Stereotypes,” “Charmless Man”) and one contender for its top five (“The Universal”), as well as Albarn’s clever, even haunting, lyricism. Take, for instance, the Morrissey-influenced disaffection of “Best Days”: “Other people break into in a cold sweat/If you said that these were the best days of their lives.” The album is Albarn’s most notable attempt to recapture the Kinks circa Village Green in the light of the morning after, and even if it doesn’t always succeed, it makes for an interesting failure.
“Best Days”:
4. “Caramel” (1999)
Like Blur grown up, 13 struck a fine balance between feedback-heavy fuzz (“Bugman”) and delicate melodies (“No Distance Left To Run”). In a way, it was its Abbey Road, a breakup album (or at least, a breakup-with-Coxon album) that combined the experimentation of Think Tank with both classic melodies and straightforward lyrics. This gospel-infused number is one of Blur’s strangest ever, ambient and dreamy and completely deserving of its seven-minute length. While “Tender” might have been 13’s most celebrated tearjerker, “Caramel” is a haunting depiction of a band coming apart at the seams.
5. “Mace” (1992)
Picking up 1994’s The Special Collectors Edition is a must for any obsessive Blur fan, as it tracks the band’s b-sides up to the Parklife era. But it’s worth getting for “Mace” alone, a snotty, poppy number that taunts, “Used to know/But now you don’t.” While “Mace” was the b-side to the classic “Popscene,” it stands completely on its own. At its release, Blur was still in the process of finding a new style that would be artistically and commercially successful. Even if the culmination of that process—Modern Life Is Rubbish—didn’t sell as good as it should have, it’s gone down in history as a classic precursor to Britpop. For a band still uncertain of its future, “Mace” is a surprisingly cocky example from the Modern Life era.
Permalink for SubSickAlien's comment on Reunited Blur Perform Live At A Museum In Essex at June 23, 2009 3:55 PM—Written by: Emily Tartanella for Magnet Magazine
Score = 0